Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis

mailman 2011-11-11
(4/10)
The isometric concept of making something more than a platformer is nice. Unfortunately this whole game looks like a neverending maze with enemies spawning all the time (basicaly they are indestructible). Controls are tricky. Adventure version is out of competition here.
View all comments (732)

danangleland 2011-07-31
(7/10)
I give this a 7, and I think anything less than a 5 is overly harsh. Sure it doesn't impress like the fantastic adventure Indie games, but it is a fun action game which does things differently. The isometric view wasn't all that common, and worked well for going around the sides of buidlings and entering them (the view could be rotated). I was only young at the time, about 11 or 12 I think, and didn't get far with it (not sure if I'd fair any better now actually, old games seem pretty hard compared to 21st century ones), but enjoyed what I did play. I wonder if some players didn't get used to the controls/view? Or maybe the graphics look too crude compared to the sumptuous adventure games. Still, this game deserves better than ~3 as an average score.
View all comments (45)

Karter 2010-12-27
(1/10)
This is what the last ninja would be if it was developed by tiertex instead of system 3 on the 64. Worst thing ever came out of Lucasarts. And i thought the previous indy titles were bad(except the adventure ones - which were great) 1/10
View all comments (177)

lobogris_1976 2010-10-23
(4/10)
Official action games of Indiana Jones were a complete disaster on all platforms. This is a thing that I never understood, since Indiana Jones films are action/adventure based, and they were a perfect base to make a cool action game. Of Indy "action" games I prefer the unofficial ones, like Rick dangerous... I know it's a platformer, not 100% an action title, but it's fun, and it had some action. This one never caught my attention. The EGA title screen here must be in the list of silly things ever made The scumm adventure ones are way better and awesome!
View all comments (61)

Scrawffler 2008-10-08
(4/10)
Quite difficult to get used to, but not too bad. A nice idea making it 3D-ish, as that was pretty rare back in the early '90s. I played this the least out of all the Indiana Jones games I've ever owned, as it wasn't really very exciting. But other than that I don't have any criticisms to give. Basically, there are better Indiana Jones games out there.
View all comments (185)

ricky500 2008-09-01
(8/10)
Not the best game around, but this game can be quite fun once you get the hang of it. Much better than the C64 version of this game, anyway. The only thing that really bugs me about this game, is that they used an EGA title screen for this game, while the PC version gets a nice VGA title screen. :-)
View all comments (102)

Mongol20[PL] 2006-05-21
Crap
View all comments (16)

MageRage 2005-10-06
(4/10)
Didnt understand it.
View all comments (61)

Lindopski 2005-02-11
Not as much fun as the adventure game, a nice attempt to bring some more action into Indy games , but released alongside a quality adventure version it was doomed to fail
View all comments (42)

Trantor 2004-12-07
(2/10)
Now, I could understand the logic behind this game on the C64, since the poor 8 bit community had been denied the great point and click game of the same name, but THIS is just wrong on the Amiga.
View all comments (245)

James Bond 2004-12-05
(3/10)
Play the adventure game instead.
View all comments (7)